Wednesday, June 23, 2010

A Scarcity of Imagination

While having a chat over a few beers with a young city planner last night, I came to some rather disheartening conclusions about the state of the imagination among our bureaucratic class in America. I realize it may not be fair to generalize on the basis of one person in one small town, but the lack of overall transformation and demand for reform in all cities nation-wide has me convinced that she represents a greater trend in the planning and public administration field.

I have seen this same resistance to innovation in people who run non-profits who are under or just at thirty years of age. They have a lot of energy and intelligence, but no vision, no drive, no thirst for lasting, systemic change. Granted, it requires a lot of research and broad-mindedness to envision public policies or economic development plans that do not conform with the trajectory of the past six decades of fossil-fueled growth . . . but with the current recession and the absolute lack of vision from the political class, I keep hoping for real alternatives from people in my own generation, only to receive a resounding "NO!" in response.

So many wonderful innovations are beginning to manifest across the U.S., mostly in those regions with the largest share of economic distress, that I can't help seeing why a place like Southern Oregon couldn't find something to emulate in these new approaches. Local currencies, regional foodsheds, staunch resistance to franchises and box stores, property laws that allow squatters to improve abandoned property, co-ops, street festivals, marijuana dispensaries, micro-wind/solar/hydro operations, rooftop gardens, film screenings, bikeshares--the list goes on and on.

But when people in a place of effective power--especially those born past 1980--assume the position of the older generation, saying such measures are "impractical," "difficult," or "too idealistic," then where do we stand?

When groups devoted to localizing the economy and food system cannot create a compelling argument for needing to do so, then what good is that organization?

A socially, culturally, and economically depressed former timber town such as I've lived in for the past two years has ample models of cities facing similar distress who are re-designing themselves out of their current dysfunction. Detroit. New Orleans. Galesburg, Illinois. Even Cleveland, Ohio.

It would be really wonderful if a young person in a position of relative authority with the city or the group devoted to all things local would take on a Transition Initiative that attempted to localize the economy not from a standpoint of "creating jobs," but from necessity. Whether or not the innovative approaches taking off across the country are practical does not seem to be a consideration for the people undertaking them; the fact that in the current economic and ecological climate a localized economy is vital to a healthy, human future appears to be sufficient unto itself.

2 comments:

Liz said...

I too find the lack of imagination and adherence to the status quo of previous generations in 'public administration yuppies' quite disturbing, but I also wanted to point out what I see on a daily basis, not as a counterpoint per se, but as a small sliver of light that is gaining luminosity. I say this as a yrppie--a young rural professional. Born in 1980, I have been a "Planner" for several years now, and interestingly, I definitely have a "quiet power" within my realm of quasi-'authority' that allows me to make changes from within the system, which was always my ideal goal in my early 20s. Regardless of the status quo and political bs of your governing body--a city, county, tribal council, etc--if you are a Planner, you are a catalyst, and you are responsible for helping to set the tenor, timbre and tone of the projects and programs that are created. There is almost a responsibility to be innovative. There is no excuse for operating in a 1970s, or 1990s or even early 2000s mindset. And here's the other thing--almost everyone "on the ground" is ready for change, ready for innovation, and these folks are sick of the earth-destroying mentality that has governed our recent 'economic development.' It just takes a hard worker who can speak the language of the good old boys network. That takes ridiculously thick skin and hard work because you have to get into the system, gain 'acceptance', stay creative and prove that creative/innovative stuff is a better alternative to the status quo. It's possible, but I just think it is a beautiful struggle and that I'm (we're) really gaining traction, because it's what a lot of people want, truly community-based. Here's my approach--I help design programs, I write federal government and foundation grants, and you know that's the most establishmentarian world one can live in. So I use my language, political and persuasive skills and creativity to insert 'revolutionary' ideas that come from the on-the-ground staffers into bureaucratic, evidence-based, culturally-appropriate language that event the feds think is innovative. It's all in the packaging. I no longer cry REVOLUTION! and rail against the system. I say it inside, and on the outside I write about our innovative, solutions-oriented, holistic wrap-around services that meet people's needs where they are at. I help elicit the people's ideas and help design programs that are crazy "hippie-ish" but I characterize them in such ways that the bureaucrats have no choice but to see our projects as cutting edge. I am doing my best to take down the master's house using his tools, our tools and the alchemy of necessity, talent and ideas while simultaneously "building infrastructure" that will promote true sustenance and "sustainability" (good lord)...I silently revel in what I'm actually doing.

Asahi Man said...

I was hoping this was your Cleveland hotlink:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmLA5TqbIY

Anyway, always enjoy the blog. Keep up the good fight.